Junglemapsat led legacyVerified 2026-05-19
Junglemap delivers content. Moxso reads signal.
Why we win
- Signal architecture vs. distribution engine
- Continuous intelligence vs. bi-weekly cadence
- Replace at renewal, content engine stays separate
Walk away when
- Education sector pure-content buyer
- MetaCompliance bundle expansion
- Established Junglemap incumbent without board pressure
Three buyers
- The Security LeaderAn individual risk trajectory mapped to NIS2 21(2)(f) — not bi-weekly NanoLearni...
- The Security BuilderIdentity-bound behavioural signal carried into the security stack — not 3-minute...
- The Head of ITA program that runs from policy — not a 12-month bi-weekly content calendar to a...
Three places we differ
- SignalWhat signals does the platform read beyond click and completion at the user level?
- CadenceWhen a regional sector attack lands between scheduled lessons, does the platform shift ind...
- PersonaCan the platform produce a 90-day individual risk trajectory at role level today?
Objections / 4 ranked
- 01NanoLearning pedagogy
- 02Kirkpatrick evidence
- 03AI for content
- 04MetaCompliance parent
Why they buy
Stockholm-founded 2006 – inventor of NanoLearning. Bi-weekly 3-minute lessons over 12 months. STAR framework. ISO-certified. 1,400 customer organisations across the Nordics and Benelux.
Open one-lineLandmines to lay / one per call, don't stack
- 01Junglemap's end users do not authenticate. What signals does the platform read at the user level beyond click and completion?
- 02When a regional sector attack lands between scheduled lessons, does the platform shift individual risk profiles?
- 03Can the platform produce a 90-day individual risk trajectory at role level today?
- 04What does the platform produce for an EU NIS2 auditor at the Article 21(2)(f) level – completion data or behavioural change at rol...
- 05Junglemap's AI converts PDFs to NanoLearning. What does the platform's AI do for risk intelligence?
- 06If you exit the platform, what happens to your individual risk history – is the data portable, or is it programme-cycle bound?