Cohort 1 · SAT-led legacy

Verified 2026-05-19 · Decays 2026-11-19

Nimblrsat led legacyVerified 2026-05-19

Nimblr trains people. Moxso measures change.

Why we win

  • Resilience Score
  • OSINT engine
  • SCIM 2.0 native
Open closing

Walk away when

  • Swedish SMB, strong Nimblr incumbent
  • Pure-channel MSP deal
  • Fragmented IT, no IAM
Open walk-away

Three buyers

  • The Security LeaderA clear view of whether risk is going up or down — not the Users report and a st...
  • The Security BuilderStandards-based provisioning that makes the IdP risk-aware — not just SSO and a...
  • The Head of ITThe program off their plate — not the cheapest yes that still needs administerin...
Open three buyers

Three places we differ

  • SignalShow your Security Leader the HRI dashboard — resilience score with department and individ...
  • CadenceWhen does your risk number actually move after an event?
  • ProvisioningIs provisioning SCIM 2.0, or a customer-hosted App registration?
Open three differences

Objections / 4 ranked

  1. 01Incumbent contract
  2. 02Nordic reflex
  3. 03Activity headline
  4. 04Pricing comparison
Open objections

Why they buy

Scanian-origin household name in SAT. Polished, modern UX with deep Nordic language coverage. Volume pricing without stacked add-ons. The cheapest yes the auditor will accept.

Open one-line

Landmines to lay / one per call, don't stack

  1. 01What is the refresh cadence on the Awareness Level – continuous, or scheduled?
  2. 02How does the Awareness Level weight a privileged-access admin versus a general-population user?
  3. 03When a new attack technique surfaces, does it modify risk profiles or trigger a course to everyone?
  4. 04Is the Microsoft integration SCIM 2.0, or a customer-hosted Azure App registration?
  5. 05For NIS2 Article 21(2)(f), what does the Nimblr export prove changed – participation, or risk?
  6. 06Can the platform show today which ten employees carry the highest risk, with a 90-day trajectory?
Open landmines