CybSafe measures behaviour. Moxso measures the threat.

Why we win

OSINT external
NIS2 architecture
Continental fit

Open closing

Walk away when

UK FTSE with existing CybSafe wrapper
Behavioural-science purist on the buying committee
Procurement RFP mandates a Forrester Wave Leader

Open walk-away

Three buyers

The Security LeaderExternal threat context fused with internal behaviour — and NIS2 evidence the Eu...
The Security BuilderA signal layer that connects external threats to internal behaviour — not intern...
The Head of ITA platform that ships usable at every tier — not an enterprise programme that ne...

Open three buyers

Three places we differ

SignalDoes the platform track what's targeting your industry right now, or only what your people...
ComplianceWhat evidence would you produce for a NIS2 audit at the individual role level?
PersonaDifferent markets need different *architectures.* The question is which one matches your b...

Open three differences

Objections / 4 ranked

01Forrester Leader
02SebDB
03HRM Maturity Model
04Three products

Open objections

Why they buy

Forrester HRM Wave Leader (co-leader). Co-author of the HRM Maturity Model. SebDB scientific foundation. Oh, Behave! research credibility. UK enterprise default. Behavioural science purist positioning.

Open one-line

Landmines to lay / one per call, don't stack

01How does your current platform incorporate external threat intelligence into individual user risk scoring?
02When a new attack campaign specific to your industry becomes active, which specific individuals does the platform flag as likely t...
03What evidence would you produce for a NIS2 audit at the individual role level for your national transposition?
04What does the platform's TCO look like across three years, including bolt-ons and Plus tier upgrades?
05If you needed to switch out one of the three products, how modular is the platform commercially and operationally?
06How quickly could your vendor onboard you if go-live was 30 days?

Open landmines