Landmines
Six questions that flip the Mimecast deal.
One per call. Don't stack. Let the silence work.
Q1
Mimecast's SOHR 2026 says only 28% combine SAT with continuous monitoring. Is Engage one of the 28%, or part of the 72%?
Architecture – exposes own-data gap
Q2
What is your Engage renewal date, and would replacing just that licence at renewal keep the email security contract intact?
Provisioning – exposes bundle entanglement
Q3
Mimecast Aware is archiving and eDiscovery. What does Engage produce for an EU NIS2 auditor at Article 21(2)(f) level?
Compliance – exposes governance vs evidence gap
Q4
Of the HRM scoring Forrester references, what runs continuously today versus what is on the 45,000-customer roadmap?
Signal – exposes roadmap-stage HRM layer
Q5
The Engage product name is still 'Awareness Training'. Has the architecture moved past SAT, or is the rebrand the move?
Persona – exposes SAT lineage in the rebrand
Q6
When a regional sector attack lands, does the platform shift individual risk profiles, or stay in the email security stack?
Cadence – exposes email-bound threat intelligence