Three places we differ. Three things to say.
Signal
Their HRM platform is assembled from Engage, Incydr, Aware, Email Security. Moxso's HRI is built signal-first: human signal, world signal, and organisation signal — one engine, not four products.
Provisioning
Their commercial model is multi-product bundle. Ours ships at the buyer's Engage renewal date.
Compliance
Their Aware product is archiving and eDiscovery. Moxso produces proof for NIS2 that your controls are actually working, per role — at audit level.
Impact
Forrester HRM Wave language: 'plans to introduce' scoring. Moxso's HRI dashboard is live today — resilience score, signal risk matrix, group breakdown, trending indicators.
Impact
Email security stays. Engage replaces. The buyer migrates one vendor relationship, not the whole portfolio.
Impact
Archiving answers the discovery counsel. NIS2 artefacts answer the regulator. Different evidence formats.
Ask
Of the HRM scoring referenced in Forrester, what runs continuously today versus what is still on the roadmap?
Say
Replace the SAT engine at the Engage renewal date. Email security stays with Mimecast separately.
Ask
What does Engage produce for an EU NIS2 auditor at Article 21(2)(f) level – behavioural change, or training delivery?