Three places we differ. Three things to say.
Signal
Their SmartRisk Agent claims 316 indicators, every one derived from inside KnowBe4. Moxso's Human Risk Intelligence connects three live signals: what your people actually do, what threats are targeting your industry right now, and who each person is in the organisation.
Metric
Their Phish-prone Percentage is a simulation output. Our Resilience Score weights risk by role and threat exposure.
Compliance
Their compliance modules document training delivered. Ours produces proof for NIS2 that your controls are actually working, per role.
Impact
Single-channel signal narrows the picture. The buyer's risk surfaces across systems KnowBe4 cannot see.
Impact
PPP answers 'did users improve at simulations'. It does not answer 'is human risk going down'.
Impact
Modules are coursework. NIS2 needs proof that controls are working — not just that training happened.
Ask
What signals does the platform capture outside the KnowBe4 simulation channel?
Say
Show your Security Leader a clear risk number the board can actually use — not a simulation click rate.
Ask
What does the auditor get when they ask for evidence of risk reduction, not training delivery?