Three places we differ. Three things to say.
Signal
Living Security's 200+ signals are internal: identity, email, endpoint, data — assuming a mature US enterprise stack. Moxso's Human Risk Intelligence adds the World signal — live OSINT monitoring active attacks and breach exposure. European mid-market organisations often don't have the stack Living Security requires.
Provisioning
Unify Enterprise: 6 to 12 months of integration. Ours ships at the buyer's SAT renewal date.
Metric
Their Human Risk Index is a security-ops score. Ours is the Resilience Score, calibrated for the board.
Impact
Living Security is built to replace your programme. HRI is built to add intelligence to the one you already run. Different motion, different fit.
Impact
Twelve months of platform rebuild before scores are usable. Or one vendor migration at the renewal date.
Impact
A board needs to see whether risk is going up or down. A 1–1000 security-ops scale does not show that clearly.
Ask
Of the 200+ signals listed, how many can your environment actually feed today — and does that include external threat intelligence or only internal stack signals?
Say
Replace the SAT vendor at your renewal date. The engine changes, the programme does not get rebuilt.
Ask
What does an HRI score of 672 mean to your board — and does it show clearly whether risk is going up or down?