Three places we differ. Three things to say.
Signal
Pistachio's two products share an auth layer but not an intelligence layer — Practice and Presence run as separate data streams. Moxso's Human Risk Intelligence unifies three native signals: what your people actually do, what threats are targeting your industry right now, and who each person is in the organisation.
Provisioning
Their platform is Microsoft Entra ID only, with Google 'planned' but unbuilt. Ours is multi-IdP via SCIM 2.0.
Persona
Their dashboard is overall progress, not individual stats – by design. Ours is individual risk profile with role weighting.
Impact
Simulation interactions and M365 anomalies stay in separate streams. HRI produces one risk profile per person, continuously updated.
Impact
Google Workspace organisations cannot evaluate Pistachio. Mixed IdP estates carry single-vendor lock-in risk.
Impact
Cohort-only reporting cannot answer the board's 'who are our five highest-risk people' question.
Ask
Does Practice's data and Presence's data produce one risk profile per person, or two separate streams?
Ask
Which IdPs do you support today, and what happens to the deployment if we move off Microsoft?
Ask
Who are your five highest-risk individuals today, and what makes each of them high-risk?